Reconnect China podcast on China’s economic diplomacy is available

Carmen Amado Mendes speaks with co-authors Diogo Borges (CCCM), Tiago Botelho dos Santos (CCCM) and Gábor Szüdi (ZSI) and about their respective Reconnect China research papers tackling different aspects of China’s economic diplomacy.

The podcast sheds light on the evolving contours of China’s economic diplomacy by looking into the emerging mechanisms for resolving commercial and political disagreements within BRI frameworks, the varied local responses to large scale Chinese projects, and signs of adjustment in China’s strategic discourse toward European partners.

Listen to the podcast episode to learn more!

The podcast can be streamed on Soundcloud and Spotify.

Transcript: www.utu.fi/fi/ajankohtaista/podcast/reconnect

All research papers are available in the Reconnect China repository.

ReConnect China Policy Brief 35: Development, Civilisation and Stability

Executive summary:

In recent years, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has introduced four landmark initiatives—Global Development (GDI), Global Security (GSI), Global Civilisation (GCI), and Global Governance (GGI)—that collectively represent effort to reshape international norms. The analysis suggests that these initiatives represent a systematic consolidation of long-standing paradigms of China’s domestic discourse—specifically the primacy of development, the diversity of civilizations, and the centrality of social stability—projected onto the global stage. By aligning its historical experience as a developing country with its contemporary diplomatic goals, Beijing seeks to provide an alternative framework for international relations that emphasises state-led modernisation and pluralistic governance. The brief explores how these paradigms bridge China’s domestic political identity with its role as a key actor in the Global South, offering a distinctive vision for global order and dispute resolution through new institutions such as the International Organisation for Mediation (IOMed).

Policy recommendations: 

  • Adopt a “selective engagement” with Chinese initiatives.
  • Identify areas of convergence where Chinese initiatives align with the UN and EU’s goals.
  • Counter-narratives that subordinate individual rights to state-led stability or development.
  • Create a new European lexicon and key narratives that avoid the trap of being perceived as paternalistic and that risk implying European superiority in the eyes of China itself as well as of the Global South.

Stay tuned with us by reading more: ReConnect China Policy Brief 35_Development, Civilisation and Stability

ReConnect China Policy Brief 34: Strengthening the EU-China IP Dialogue

Executive summary:

The EU-China IP Dialogue Mechanism, established in 2003, has facilitated technical exchanges on IP legislation, enforcement, and judicial protection for over two decades. Yet implementation gaps between dialogue outputs and on-the-ground outcomes continue to challenge European businesses operating in China. While China has made significant progress in IP protection—reflected in consistently rising satisfaction scores and strong Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) court performance—enforcement divergences persist, particularly in online counterfeiting, trade secret protection, and Standard Essential Patent (SEP) governance. This policy brief argues that incremental technical cooperation alone is insufficient to address emerging structural tensions. The EU should complement the existing Dialogue with an EU-China High-Level IP Security and Enforcement Dialogue, deploy dedicated European IP attaché teams in key Chinese economic regions, and lead plurilateral diplomacy at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to establish a Joint Understanding on Fair SEP Litigation. These recommendations aim to transform the IP dialogue from a declaratory mechanism into a results-oriented enforcement tool that protects European innovation while fostering reciprocal engagement.

Policy recommendations: 

  • Complement the existing working-level mechanism with a formal EU-China High-Level IP Security and Enforcement Dialogue
  • Institutionalising Engagement through Existing Support Mechanisms
  • Leading Plurilateral Diplomacy for Fair SEP Litigations

Stay tuned with us by reading more: ReConnect China Policy Brief 34_Strengthening the EU-China IP Dialogue

Register for the 3rd ECKF conference until 4 June!

3rd ECKF conference, 12.6.2026, Brussels, Belgium (host: EGMONT Royal Institute for International Relations) I Title: ReConnect China Dialogue? Conditions, Constraints, and Futures of EU–China Engagement

The 3rd conference “ReConnect China Dialogue? Conditions, Constraints, and Futures of EU–China Engagement” will take place on 12 June in Brussels (hosted by the EGMONT Royal Institute for International Relations).

The conference will offer a multidimensional overview of the current state of EU–China relations, bringing together perspectives from economics, politics, technology, and international affairs.

You can find more information on the website of University of Tartu, including the full conference programme.

Interested? Please register until the 4th June! Places are limited!

ReConnect China Policy Brief 33: Leveraging EU-China Synergies to Scale CCUS

Executive summary:

Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) technology is essential for the European Union to achieve its 2050 climate neutrality target, particularly for hard-to-abate industrial sectors. Yet the EU currently captures less than 0.5 million tonnes of CO2 annually, while needing to scale to 50 million tonnes by 2030 and 450 million tonnes by 2050—requiring a nearly thousandfold increase within 25 years. China, by contrast, has achieved rapid CCUS deployment, with over 120 projects and more than 1 million tonnes of annual capture capacity, spanning diverse technological pathways from coal power to steel, cement, and chemical industries. Chinese enterprises have been willing to invest in CCUS as a strategic emerging field, accepting that early-stage projects may not yet be commercially profitable.

This policy brief argues that enhanced EU-China CCUS cooperation aligns with the European Commission’s “de-risking” approach: managing strategic dependencies while pursuing mutual benefit. China’s manufacturing scale and deployment experience complement EU strengths in regulatory frameworks and monitoring technologies. Based on learning curve analysis using a 15% learning rate for EU-China cooperation—reflecting enhanced learning-by-doing from the larger combined market and China’s manufacturing scale advantages—cooperation could reduce EU capture costs by an estimated 52% by 2040, compared to EU-alone deployment with a 10% learning rate. This translates to projected annual savings of approximately EUR 5 billion at EU deployment scales of 280 million tonnes per year by 2040. Moreover, cooperation enables the EU to establish standards and frameworks in this critical technology area while accelerating progress towards its binding climate targets.

Policy recommendations:

  • Establish a Joint EU-China CCUS Technology Cooperation Platform under the EU-China High-Level Environment and Climate Dialogue (HECD).
  • Develop an EU-China CCUS Technology and Supply Chain Cooperation Framework to facilitate joint R&D on next-generation capture technologies and enable cost-competitive manufacturing partnerships.
  • Develop joint Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) standards with China as a foundational step for cross-border CCUS cooperation and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) alignment.
  • Engage in regular policy exchange with China on CCUS support mechanisms, financing instruments, and project permitting.

Stay tuned with us by reading more: ReConnect China Policy Brief 33-Leveraging EU-China Synergies to Scale CCUS

ReConnect China Policy Brief 32: Europe’s Supply Chain Security Dilemma

Executive summary:

Beijing has become more explicit in weaponising trade dependencies through export controls, particularly in critical minerals and rare earth elements (REEs). Europe now faces a structural dilemma: how to reduce strategic vulnerabilities relative to China without shifting towards increasing dependencies on the United States.

This brief examines two key pressure points for European strategic value chains: EVs (and batteries in particular) and rare-earth permanent magnets. Furthermore, it evaluates emerging U.S. counter-initiatives such as Pax Silica and FORGE. The conclusion is straightforward: rather than reducing exposure, recent European trade and industrial policies have largely redistributed dependence across different segments of strategic value chains. Europe must pursue an international economic agenda of diversification of supplies while strengthening supply-chain resilience, not bloc alignment.

Policy recommendations:

  • Define sectoral red lines: The European Commission should publish a tiered dependency taxonomy – categorising strategic value chain exposures – covering at minimum batteries, semiconductor packaging, and rare-earth processing. Each red-line designation should carry binding review triggers and mandatory timeline commitments for exposure reduction.
  • Rebalance exposure through diversification: Expand domestic and third-country supply capacity in batteries, semiconductor packaging, and rare-earth processing. The EU should fast-track Strategic Partnership Agreements for REEs and battery materials, converting existing political frameworks into commercially binding, demand-guaranteed offtake arrangements.
  • Strengthen resilience, not protectionism: Combine targeted industrial policy with supply-chain redundancy rather than relying solely on trade defence instruments.
  • Engage the United States without subordination: Where interests align – particularly in critical minerals – the EU should proactively propose joint instruments, including coordinated price-floor or price undertaking mechanisms. Still, the EU should resist hub-and-spoke arrangements that undermine European regulatory and industrial autonomy.
  • Lead on green technology diversification: Take proactive leadership in reducing supply-chain concentration in China by expanding green-tech sourcing and manufacturing within the EU and trusted partner countries.
  • Avoid full alignment with third countries: Pursue strategic autonomy through diversification and coalition-building rather than alignment with either a China-centric or U.S.-centric economic order.

Stay tuned with us by reading more: ReConnect China Policy Brief No.32-Neither Pax Sinica nor Pax Silica Europe’s Supply Chain Security Dilemma

Europe-China table on state-society relations in China took place on 15 April

The next round of the Europea-China Table took place on 15 April to discuss the changing dynamics in state-society relations in the People’s Republic of China.

Organised by Reconnect China partner IAI – Istituto Affari Internazionali, the online event focused on recent developments in social governance and examine how these, in turn, shape, and are shaped by, state–society relations.

The roundtable discussion used two analytical entry points presented in two keynote speeches: Beatrice Gallelli (IAI) talked about environmental governance, while Runya Qiaoan (Palacky University Olomouc) introduced grid management to the expert audience.

Under the professional moderation of Anna Lisa Ahlers (Max Planck Institute) a lively debate engaged on how these two domains can shape the evolving relationship between the state and society.

By situating these practices within their broader political and institutional context, the roundtable aims to contribute to a balanced understanding of Chinese governance and its international implications.

You can find more information on our website about the series of the Reconnect China roundtables.

 

Europe-China CCUS Workshop successfully held in Beijing

On 31st March, the Europe-China CCUS Workshop took place in Beijing (East Bay International Centre) under the auspices of Reconnect China partner Innovation Norway.

The workshop provided a forum for experts from diverse organisations to engage in a constructive and valuable discussion around topical issues on CCUS policies between Europe and China.

The meeting started with the welcome address by Mr Henning Kristoffersen (Country Director of Innovation Norway China & Commercial Counsellor of the Royal Norwegian Embassy in Beijing), followed by Mr Peng Gao‘s (Senior Commercial Officer of the Royal Norwegian Embassy in Beijing) presentation of the Reconnect China project.

The thematic discussions were kicked off by a presentation on global CCUS development and international collaboration held by Prof Tao Yang (Yungu Professor, Westlake University), with presentations on EU-China CCUS cooperation and development (Mr Jiutian Zhang, Executive Director of Green Development Institute), on European and Chinese CCUS financing experiences (Prof Xi Liang, Co-founder and Secretary General of the UK-China CCUS Centre) and on compliance assurance for CO2 offshore strategy (Mr Yuan Guo, H2 & CCS Lead of DNV Energy Systems China) rounding up the first part of the meeting.

After the coffee break, the audience could delve deeper into current CCUS aspects, such as green design (Mr Bi Shuli, Assistant Director of World Green Design Organisation), the collaboration between the EU and China on CCUS (Mr Zhonghua Xu, Chair of the Chamber Energy Working Group), the challenges for CO2 capture technology in China (Prof Lin Gao, Researcher of Huairou Laboratory) or the next-generation climate technologies (Mr. Lü Xuedu, Senior Advisor at the Asian Development Bank).

Ms Helika Jürgenson from the EU IPR Help Desk in China also delivered a presentation on IPR issues.  As visible from the interest around IPR, the relevant stakeholders within this knowledge-intensive industry need further support guidance on IPR from expert organisations.

A general discussion and Q&A session closed the interactive meeting where the plan for a CCUS event in Oslo in the second half of 2026 was also discussed.

The results of the workshop will feed into upcoming scientific publications (policy brief) of the Reconnect China project.

 

 

Reconnect China podcast: Evolving patterns of China’s involvement in African infastructure

Richard Turcsanyi speaks with his co-authors Kara Němečková and Veronika Blablová about their policy briefEvolving patterns of China’s involvement in African infrastructure”.

The authors outline how Chinese loans tied to infrastructure construction became one of the key aspects of China-Africa relations over the previous decade, but also how and why they declined in recent years. Yet China’s presence in Africa is by no means over. What are the new types of China’s involvement projects in Africa?

Listen to the podcast episode to learn more!

The podcast can be streamed on Soundcloud and Spotify.

Transcript: www.utu.fi/fi/ajankohtaista/podcast/reconnect

Workshop on de-dollarisation and the rise of the RMB

In a joint effort between Reconnect China, the Dutch China Knowledge Network (CKN) and the China Europe Research Network (CHERN) an expert round table on De-dollarisation and the Rise of the RMB was held at the NL Permanent Representation on 10 March 2026.
In an engaging and productive debate between top academics like Johannes Petry (Goethe University Frankfurt) and Jens Van´t Klooster (University of Amsterdam) the question on how the EU should adapt to the newest monetary developments was discussed. One of the options presented is a new intergovernmental Euro Internationalisation Strategy Forum to co-ordinate trade and financial policy in support of the political aim of internationalizing the Euro.
In addition to academic experts, the workshop was attended by around 20 people, among them officials from DG FISMA (internationalisartion of the Euro desk) and DG ECFIN (China desk), the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Finance of The Netherlands,  as well as from advocacy group Positive Money.